ARLINGTON, VA — Well, the Y2K apocalypse has failed to occur.
By now we were supposed to be devouring our children (or being devoured
by them). The Third Millennium is off to a smooth start.
The Second Millennium ended with a pretty lousy century. Let’s
hope we can put it behind us and move on. The three men most often
named as “Person of the Century” — Franklin Roosevelt,
Winston Churchill, and Albert Einstein — were benefactors, allies,
and admirers of one of the bloodiest men of the millennium, Joseph
Stalin. It’s as if the three most distinguished men of the Middle
Ages had all been pals of Genghis Khan.
Even the phrase “Person of the Century” is a relic of
the archaic feminist thinking of the twentieth century. Obviously the
most influential individual of any century is likely to be male, but
by the late twentieth century it was a breach of etiquette — an
ideological code of manners — to acknowledge such things. As
recently as this week I read an article arguing for homosexual “marriage” — another
example of the outmoded twentieth-century attitudes some people still
can’t let go of.
The twentieth century was marked by its smug belief in its superiority
to all earlier ages. It decided that the immemorial morals and customs
of mankind should be changed — as if that were even possible.
The state would be the instrument of “building a new society” by
means of force, propaganda, and economic dependence. Tyranny became “liberation,” degeneracy “progress.”
Time to move on
The state’s new mission was to cut all roots
in the past that might enable its subjects to resist assimilation to
the New Society. Those who managed to maintain their roots were accused
of treason, reaction, racism, superstition, and hate. The state claimed
to be “scientific.” It
acted in the name of “the oppressed”: “the people,” “the
proletariat,” “the masses,” “minorities,” “women,” and
even sexual deviants (who were “victims” of the traditional
The twentieth-century state denied God and the existence of any stable
human nature, both of which imply immutable standards of right and
wrong that might limit the authority and power of the state. It claimed
the power to eradicate all old laws and replace them with new ones
that suited its purposes. Even written constitutions could be “reinterpreted” in
keeping with the demands of the New Society. Plain words whose meaning
had never been in doubt became “living documents,” arbitrarily
endowed with wholly new meanings by state officials.
Old sins like fornication, sodomy, and abortion became new “rights.” Meanwhile,
traditional rights like property ownership were severely curtailed.
Through the state, with its boundless taxing power, some people could
live off the productive energy of others. This was called “social
justice.” The twentieth-century state became obsessed with preserving
the natural environment, even as it demolished the moral, spiritual,
and cultural environment of Christendom.
Artists, scholars, and philosophers became enthusiasts of the New
Society, hostile to the “bourgeoisie” and “the middle
class,” as the remnants of traditional society were scornfully
called. Obscenity and obscurity, dissonance and ugliness, became hallmarks
of twentieth-century art. Popular art, still bound by the market, found
obscenity more profitable than obscurity, but rarely challenged the
premises of the New Society.
Education, controlled by the state, became propaganda, called “consciousness-raising,” designed
to make children submissive units of the New Society. The idea of “evolution” was
adapted to teach children that the New Society was the inevitable development
of human history. The mass-produced “intellectual” (the
opposite of the traditional independent scholar) became a new social
type, devoted to the fantasies of the New Society, which were called “ideals.”
Since the aims of the New Society were fundamentally impossible, resistance
continued and partly succeeded. God and human nature still existed
and asserted themselves through men like Alexander Solzhenitsyn and
Pope John Paul II, who struck chords in millions and undermined the
legitimacy of the New Society.
By the end of the century, men’s minds were still entangled
in the tattered delusions of the New Society. But even “progressive” politicians
found it advantageous to pay lip service to Jesus Christ and human
freedom. Mankind may yet recover from the twentieth century.
This column was originally published by Griffin Internet Syndicate on
January 4, 2000.
Copyright © 2010 by Joe Sobran and the
Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation. All rights reserved.
Joe Sobran is an author and a syndicated columnist. See complete bio
and latest writings.
Watch Sobran on YouTube.
To subscribe, renew, or support further columns by Joe Sobran, please send
a tax-deductible donation to the:
Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation
P.O. Box 1383
or sponsor online.